Biologics

MiMedx Group, Inc.

FDA issued a warning letter to MiMedx Group, Inc. (Marietta, GA, United States) on Dec 20, 2023, citing 21 CFR 1271.10, 21 CFR 1271.15, 21 CFR 1271.3, 21 CFR 211.100 and 4 more regulations. Subject: Deviations, CFR, Regulations for Human Cells, Tissues & Cellular Products (HCT, Ps).

From the letter: “Your firm failed to establish adequate written procedures for production and process control designed to assure that the drug product has the identity, strength, purity, and quality it purports or is represented to possess [21 CFR…”

Marietta, GA, United StatesIssued Dec 20, 2023Posted Jan 9, 2024No close-out recorded

At a glance

What a reviewer notes before reading: findings, citations, the response deadline and what the letter warns of.

Violations
8 findings · 4 issue types
Response due
Fifteen (15) working days of receipt
FDA asks for
2 actions
Named as possible actions
Seizure, injunction
Issued by
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
Published status
No close-out recorded

AI assisted findings

Model-assisted reading of each issue. Open one to see the FDA text it comes from, and check it against the full letter.

01Production & process controls · 21 CFR 211.100(a)The firm failed to establish adequate written procedures for production and process control to assure product identity, strength, purity, and quality.
Your firm failed to establish adequate written procedures for production and process control designed to assure that the drug product has the identity, strength, purity, and quality it purports or is represented to possess [21 CFR 211.100(a)]. Specifically, your firm has manufactured and distributed AXIOFILL™ without establishing adequate written procedures to assure that your process is capable of consistently producing product that meets appropriate attributes relating to identity, quality, and purity. Namely, your written protocol, reflected in your *Process Performance Qualification Report for Placental Collagen Matrix (PCM)* (dated 2/20/23),is deficient in that there is no assessment of AXIOFILL™ identity, you have failed to identify tests to assess product quality, and your testing for purity is incomplete.
02Laboratory controls & testing · 21 CFR 211.160(b)The firm failed to establish laboratory controls with appropriate final specifications for testing and release of the product.
Your firm failed to establish laboratory controls that include scientifically sound and appropriate specifications designed to assure that drug products conform to appropriate standards of identity, strength, quality, and purity [21 CFR 211.160(b)]. Specifically, your firm has not established laboratory controls that include appropriate final specifications for testing and release of AXIOFILL™ to assure that each batch conforms to appropriate standards of identity and purity during routine production.
03Production & process controls · 21 CFR 211.110(a)(6)In-process control procedures are deficient because they do not include bioburden testing.
In-process control procedures are deficient in that your control procedures do not include bioburden testing [21 CFR 211.110(a)(6)]. According to your *Process Performance Qualification Report for Placental Collagen Matrix (PCM)* (effective 2/20/23), your firm removed (b)(4) bioburden testing from routine commercial production of AXIOFILL™ after completing “validation production.” Your product is (b)(4) sterilized. In-process bioburden testing is critical for assuring that bioburden levels do not exceed the validated sterility assurance level (SAL).
04Laboratory controls & testing · 21 CFR 211.160(b)(3)Drug product samples are not representative of the entire batch because only a fixed number of samples are collected for residual moisture testing.
Drug product samples are not representative of the entire batch [21 CFR 211.160(b)(3)]. For example, samples of AXIOFILL™ tested for residual moisture as a measure of purity per your finished product specification are not representative of the entire batch. According to CSOP220.116, *Product Visual Inspection* (revision 54, effective 12/09/22), only (b)(4) of each lot of your Placental Collagen Matrix product is collected for residual moisture testing. There are no considerations for batch size. This is not representative because, when products are lyophilized,moisture content can vary across the lot.
05Components & suppliers · 21 CFR 211.84(d)(1)The firm failed to perform at least one specific identity test for each lot of a component used in the product.
Your firm has failed to conduct at least one test to verify the identity of each component of a drug product using specific identity tests, if they exist [21 CFR 211.84(d)(1)]. Specifically, your firm does not perform at least one test to verify the identity of each lot of “Placental Collagen Matrix (PCM) (b)(4)” using the specific identity test that exists. Although your firm indicated that the test used to determine the concentration of PCM (b)(4) is considered an identity test, only concentration results and not identity are reported to you by the contract laboratory. PCM (b)(4) is used to manufacture AXIOFILL™.
06Components & suppliers · 21 CFR 211.84(a), 21 CFR 211.84(b)The firm failed to withhold components from use until tested and released, and sampling was not representative of each lot.
Your firm failed to withhold each lot of components from use until the lot has been sampled, tested, or examined, as appropriate, and released for use by the quality control unit. Your firm further failed to take representative samples of each shipment of each lot of components for testing or examination [21 CFR 211.84(a) and 21 CFR 211.84(b)].Specifically, your firm failed to withhold each lot of PCM (b)(4) from use in AXIOFILL™ processing until the lot had been tested to assure compliance with your specification and released for use by your quality unit. According to your PCM (b)(4) specification, SPC300.034 (effective8/24/22), results of “composition” testing (also referred to as “concentration analysis”) are not required for release. Although your specification requires an investigation if results are failing, this procedure allows your use of components whose testing has not been reviewed prior to release, which creates the potential for your use of noncomplying components in drug processing. Additionally, according to this same specification, only (b)(4) from each PCM (b)(4) lot received is collected for concentration analysis. Sampling is not based on the lot size, which fails to ensure that samples are representative of each lot.
07Laboratory controls & testingThe firm failed to include specifications for elemental impurities and endotoxin in final product specifications.
Additionally, with respect to your final specifications used for testing and release of AXIOFILL™, we have concerns that your firm has failed to include specifications for elemental impurities and endotoxin, although your firm has identified “elemental impurities from product surfaces” and endotoxin as critical quality attributes in your *Process Performance Qualification Report for Placental Collagen Matrix (PCM)* (effective 2/20/23).
08Facilities & equipmentThe firm did not provide a disinfectant efficacy study for a disinfectant used in the facility and on equipment.
We are also concerned that your firm did not provide a disinfectant efficacy study for (b)(4), used in your processing facility and on production equipment, during the inspection, although it was requested.

Additional FDA passages

1 extracted findings

Selected FDA passages, not the complete letter.

01

Your firm failed to establish laboratory controls that include scientifically sound and appropriate specifications designed to assure that drug products conform to appropriate standards of identity, strength, quality, and purity [21 CFR 211.160(b)].** Specifically, your firm has not established laboratory controls that include appropriate final specifications for testing and release of AXIOFILL™ to assure that each batch conforms to appropriate standards of identity and purity during routine production.

What FDA requested

  • Provide specific steps taken or planned to address the violations and prevent recurrence, including documentation
  • Provide reasoning and supporting information if you believe products are not in violation

FDA Warning Letter

27 paragraphs · 1 section

Text as published on FDA.gov, retrieved Sep 8, 2026. Layout added for reading; the wording is FDA’s. View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)

DatedDecember 20, 2023
Sent to23-662942
AddressedDear Mr. Capper

1Letter text

19 paragraphs

During inspections of your MiMedx Group, Inc. (hereinafter, “MiMedx”) locations at 300 Town Park Dr NW Ste 260, Kennesaw, GA 30144, and 1775 W Oak Commons Court NE, Marietta, GA 30062, conducted between February 22, 2023 and March 2, 2023, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documented your manufacture of a product derived from the placenta, AXIOFILL™, which you also refer to as “Placental Collagen Matrix” (hereinafter, “your product” or “your Placental Collagen Matrix product”). You have distributed your product directly to healthcare professionals and medical facilities throughout the United States. Your product is applied topically (for example, to “deep, irregular wounds”) and purports to be sterile.

Information and records gathered prior to, during, and after the inspections, including information on your website, www.mimedx.com, reflect that your product is intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease or a condition in humans. For example, according to your product labeling, AXIOFILL™ is intended “[for] use in the replacement or supplementation of damaged or inadequate integumental tissue.” Clinical use examples referenced on your website include “trauma wounds,” “diabetic foot ulcers,” and “deep, irregular wounds.” Your product is a drug as defined in section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B)]. Additionally, your product is a biological product as defined in section 351(i) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) [42 U.S.C. § 262(i)].

Your product is also a human cell, tissue, or cellular or tissue-based product (HCT/P) as defined in 21 CFR 1271.3(d) and is subject to regulation under 21 CFR Part 1271, issued under the authority of section 361 of the PHS Act [42 U.S.C. § 264]. HCT/Ps that do not meet all the criteria in 21 CFR 1271.10(a), and when no exception in 21 CFR 1271.15 applies, are not regulated solely under section 361 of the PHS Act [42 U.S.C. § 264] and the regulations in 21 CFR Part 1271. Such products are regulated as drugs, devices, and/or biological products under the FD&C Act and/or the PHS Act, and are subject to additional regulation, including appropriate premarket review.

Based on a review of relevant materials, MiMedx does not qualify for any exception in 21 CFR 1271.15, and your product fails to meet all criteria in 21 CFR 1271.10(a). Specifically, your product at minimum fails to meet the minimal manipulation criterion set forth in 21 CFR 1271.10(a)(1) and defined for structural tissue in 21 CFR 1271.3(f)(1), because your processing alters the original relevant characteristics of the placenta related to its utility for reconstruction, repair, or replacement.1 Therefore, this HCT/P is not regulated solely under section 361 of the PHS Act [42 U.S.C. § 264] and the regulations in 21 CFR Part 1271.

To lawfully market a drug that is a biological product, a valid biologics license application (BLA) must be in effect [42 U.S.C. § 262(a)]. Such licenses are issued only after showing that the product is safe, pure, and potent. While in the development stage, such products may be distributed for clinical use in humans only if the sponsor has an investigational new drug application (IND) in effect as specified by FDA regulations [21 U.S.C. § 355(i); 42 U.S.C. § 262(a)(3); 21 CFR Part 312]. Your product, AXIOFILL™, is not the subject of an approved BLA nor is there an IND in effect for this product. Based upon this information, we have determined that your actions have violated the FD&C Act and the PHS Act.

Additionally, during the inspection, FDA investigators documented evidence of significant deviations from current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) requirements related to your manufacture of AXIOFILL™, including deviations from section 501(a)(2)(B) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. § 351(a)(2)(B)] and 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211. We note that, at the time of the inspection, you had already manufactured over (b)(4) vials of AXIOFILL™ and distributed (b)(4) vials of AXIOFILL™ since September 2022.

At the conclusion of the inspection, FDA investigators issued a Form FDA-483, List of Inspectional Observations, describing significant deviations applicable to AXIOFILL™ operations at your Town Park facility. FDA identified additional significant deviations upon further review of the information collected during this inspection, as discussed below. These deviations include, but are not limited to, the following:

1. Your firm failed to establish adequate written procedures for production and process control designed to assure that the drug product has the identity, strength, purity, and quality it purports or is represented to possess [21 CFR 211.100(a)]. Specifically, your firm has manufactured and distributed AXIOFILL™ without establishing adequate written procedures to assure that your process is capable of consistently producing product that meets appropriate attributes relating to identity, quality, and purity. Namely, your written protocol, reflected in your Process Performance Qualification Report for Placental Collagen Matrix (PCM) (dated 2/20/23),is deficient in that there is no assessment of AXIOFILL™ identity, you have failed to identify tests to assess product quality, and your testing for purity is incomplete.2

Process validation studies determine whether an initial state of control has been established while routine monitoring of process performance and product attributes determines whether control is maintained. Establishment of appropriate attributes relating to identity, quality, and purity of drug products is essential for assuring product quality over the product lifecycle. 2. Your firm failed to establish laboratory controls that include scientifically sound and appropriate specifications designed to assure that drug products conform to appropriate standards of identity, strength, quality, and purity [21 CFR 211.160(b)]. Specifically, your firm has not established laboratory controls that include appropriate final specifications for testing and release of AXIOFILL™ to assure that each batch conforms to appropriate standards of identity and purity during routine production.

3. In-process control procedures are deficient in that your control procedures do not include bioburden testing [21 CFR 211.110(a)(6)]. According to your Process Performance Qualification Report for Placental Collagen Matrix (PCM) (effective 2/20/23), your firm removed (b)(4) bioburden testing from routine commercial production of AXIOFILL™ after completing “validation production.” Your product is (b)(4) sterilized. In-process bioburden testing is critical for assuring that bioburden levels do not exceed the validated sterility assurance level (SAL).

4. Drug product samples are not representative of the entire batch [21 CFR 211.160(b)(3)]. For example, samples of AXIOFILL™ tested for residual moisture as a measure of purity per your finished product specification are not representative of the entire batch. According to CSOP220.116, Product Visual Inspection (revision 54, effective 12/09/22), only (b)(4) of each lot of your Placental Collagen Matrix product is collected for residual moisture testing. There are no considerations for batch size. This is not representative because, when products are lyophilized,moisture content can vary across the lot.

5. Your firm has failed to conduct at least one test to verify the identity of each component of a drug product using specific identity tests, if they exist [21 CFR 211.84(d)(1)]. Specifically, your firm does not perform at least one test to verify the identity of each lot of “Placental Collagen Matrix (PCM) (b)(4)” using the specific identity test that exists. Although your firm indicated that the test used to determine the concentration of PCM (b)(4) is considered an identity test, only concentration results and not identity are reported to you by the contract laboratory. PCM (b)(4) is used to manufacture AXIOFILL™.

6. Your firm failed to withhold each lot of components from use until the lot has been sampled, tested, or examined, as appropriate, and released for use by the quality control unit. Your firm further failed to take representative samples of each shipment of each lot of components for testing or examination [21 CFR 211.84(a) and 21 CFR 211.84(b)].Specifically, your firm failed to withhold each lot of PCM (b)(4) from use in AXIOFILL™ processing until the lot had been tested to assure compliance with your specification and released for use by your quality unit. According to your PCM (b)(4) specification, SPC300.034 (effective8/24/22), results of “composition” testing (also referred to as “concentration analysis”) are not required for release. Although your specification requires an investigation if results are failing, this procedure allows your use of components whose testing has not been reviewed prior to release, which creates the potential for your use of noncomplying components in drug processing. Additionally, according to this same specification, only (b)(4) from each PCM (b)(4) lot received is collected for concentration analysis. Sampling is not based on the lot size, which fails to ensure that samples are representative of each lot.

Additionally, with respect to your final specifications used for testing and release of AXIOFILL™, we have concerns that your firm has failed to include specifications for elemental impurities and endotoxin, although your firm has identified “elemental impurities from product surfaces” and endotoxin as critical quality attributes in your Process Performance Qualification Report for Placental Collagen Matrix (PCM) (effective 2/20/23).

We are also concerned that your firm did not provide a disinfectant efficacy study for (b)(4), used in your processing facility and on production equipment, during the inspection, although it was requested. Neither this letter nor the observations noted on the FDA-483, which were discussed with you at the conclusion of the inspection, are intended to be an all-inclusive list of deficiencies that may exist at your facility. It is your responsibility to ensure full compliance with the FD&C Act, PHS Act, and all applicable regulations.

We acknowledge receipt of your correspondences, dated March 23, 2023 and October 23, 2023, responding to FDA’s inspectional observations on the FDA-483 issued to your Town Park facility. We have reviewed your responses and have determined that your responses are inadequate to address the deficiencies noted above. We note that “MIMEDX does not agree that the CGMP requirements are legally applicable to AXIOFILL” and that your responses contain no corrective actions directly related to the FDA-483 observations.

This letter notifies you of our findings and provides you an opportunity to address them. Failure to adequately address these matters may result in regulatory action without further notice. Such actions may include seizure and/or injunction.

Response requested

We request that you respond in writing within fifteen (15) working days from your receipt of this letter, outlining the specific steps you have taken or plan to take to address any violations and prevent their recurrence. Include any documentation necessary to show that the matters have been addressed. If you cannot address these matters within fifteen (15) working days, please explain the reason for your delay and the timeframe for completion. If you do not believe your products are in violation of the FD&C Act, PHS Act, or applicable regulations, include your reasoning and any supporting information for our consideration.

Your response should be sent via email to: Jason D. Abel, Compliance Officer, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Biological Products Operations – Division 1, email address: Jason.Abel@fda.hhs.gov. If you have any questions, please contact Jason D. Abel via email.

Sincerely, /S/ Michael W. Roosevelt Program Division Director Office of Biological Products Operations – Division I

_____________________

1 Because your product fails to meet the minimum manipulation criterion at 21 CFR 1271.10(a)(1), this letter does not further evaluate the other criteria in 21 CFR 1271.10(a).

2 Your Placental Collagen Matrix product specification indicates that your firm tests AXIOFILL™ for purity via residual moisture testing. However, purity is not limited to relative freedom from residual moisture. Refer to the definition of purity in 21 CFR 600.3(r). U.S. Food and Drug Administration Office of Biological Products Operations www.fda.gov

Citations and trends

Each 21 CFR section, ISO 13485 clause and issue type in this letter, how often it appears across all letters, and its trend by the year FDA issued the letters. 2026 runs to Nov 3, 2026, compared with the same dates last year. Select a row or a bar to see those letters in Letters. As cited in this historical letter, not a statement of current requirements.

Regulations

21 CFR 600.3Definitions3letters cite it
0 letters issued this year vs 0 by the same date last yearAbout 21 CFR 600.3 →
120211202212023020240202502026

Also cited: 21 CFR 1271, 21 CFR 312, 21 CFR 210

Issue types

Record details

Issuing center
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
Issuing office
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
Location
Marietta, GA, United States
Letter posted date
Jan 9, 2024
Letter issue date
Dec 20, 2023
Addressed to
Chief Executive Officer
Inspection dates
Dec 9, 2022
Response window
15 working days after receipt of this letter
Read the source clause
We request that you respond in writing within fifteen (15) working days from your receipt of this letter, outlining the specific steps you have taken or plan to take to address any violations and prevent their recurrence.
Record length
1,908 words · 14 recorded redactions
Published status
No published close-out
FDA reference
23-662942
Original letter
View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)
Dataset last checked
Nov 11, 2026 · How this is built

A response window is not a calculated due date. Source excerpts are selected passages. Finding interpretations and categories are model-assisted. Verify the original letter before relying on a finding.

See the pattern across 1,707 lettersFind letters like this →
Keep exploring

More biologics letters

Recent records for the same product type. Your previous filters remain available when you return.

Keep exploring

Find letters like this →
For regulated teams

Put this kind of reading to
work on your own records.

Botable builds and runs a custom AI layer around the software you already use, so your team can do the job you hired them for.

Every letter by dateHow this database is built

FDA Warning Letter Alerts

Share this view

Send the same filters, search and view to a colleague.

You choose what to post or send. Sharing a link does not change access to this site.