Kimera Labs, Inc.
FDA issued a warning letter to Kimera Labs, Inc. (Miramar, FL, United States) on Sep 1, 2023, citing 21 CFR 312.7, 21 CFR 211.113, 21 CFR 211.192, 21 CFR 211.167 and 8 more regulations. Subject: Investigational Device Exemptions (IDE).
From the letter: “Your firm has failed to validate the aseptic processes used to manufacture XoGlo®, XoGlo®Pro, and Amnio2X®.”
FDA published a close-out letter on Jun 23, 2026. The findings below are from the original warning letter.
At a glance
What a reviewer notes before reading: findings, citations, the response deadline and what the letter warns of.
- Violations
- 15 findings · 7 issue types
- Cited
- 21 CFR 312.7, 21 CFR 211.113, 21 CFR 211.192, 21 CFR 211.167, 21 CFR 211.160, 21 CFR 211.100, 21 CFR 211.176, 21 CFR 211.42, 21 CFR 211.165, 21 CFR 211.84, 21 CFR 211.166, 21 CFR 1271.3
- Response due
- Fifteen (15) working days of receipt
- FDA asks for
- 4 actions
- Named as possible actions
- Seizure, injunction, refusal of admission
- Issued by
- Division of Biological Products Operations I · Office of Inspections and Investigations
- Published status
- Close-out Jun 23, 2026
AI assisted findings
Model-assisted reading of each issue. Open one to see the FDA text it comes from, and check it against the full letter.
01Production & process controls · 21 CFR 211.113(b)Aseptic processes for sterile products were not validated.
Your firm has failed to validate the aseptic processes used to manufacture XoGlo®, XoGlo®Pro, and Amnio2X®.
02Production & process controls · 21 CFR 211.113(b)Environmental monitoring procedures allowed excessive microbial limits and lacked particulate monitoring.
Your written procedure for microbiological monitoring of surfaces, air, and personnel in the aseptic processing area indicates your action and alert limits for microorganisms are (b)(4) and (b)(4) CFUs, respectively.
03Production & process controls · 21 CFR 211.113(b)Non-viable particulate monitoring was not performed for each production batch.
You have not performed non-viable particulate monitoring of the aseptic processing areas in association with each production batch.
04Investigations & OOS · 21 CFR 211.192Investigations into unexplained discrepancies or batch failures were not documented.
you failed to document an investigation into the positive sterility result obtained for XoGlo®Pro lot 4000078P.
05Laboratory controls & testing · 21 CFR 211.167(a)Sterility samples were frozen before testing, potentially masking contamination.
Sterility samples of Amnio2x® are frozen prior to sterility testing.
06Laboratory controls & testing · 21 CFR 211.167(a)Sterility sampling plan was not representative of lot size.
Your written procedure for Amnio2x® specifies testing of (b)(4) vials for sterility regardless of lot size, which may consist of as many as (b)(4) vials.
07Quality unit & oversight · 21 CFR 211.160(b)Product specifications were tentative and not scientifically sound.
Your specifications are listed as “tentative.”
08Production & process controls · 21 CFR 211.100(a)Manufacturing processes were not validated.
the manufacturing processes for your products have not been validated.
09Laboratory controls & testing · 21 CFR 211.176Products were not tested for penicillin despite potential cross-contamination.
you have not performed testing of these products for penicillin prior to final product release.
10Facilities & equipment · 21 CFR 211.42(c)(10)(v)Cleaning and disinfection procedures were not validated and lacked contact times.
You failed to validate your written cleaning procedure for your laminar flow (b)(4) and your cleanrooms where your products are manufactured.
11Facilities & equipment · 21 CFR 211.42(c)(10)(v)Cleaning procedure did not specify disinfectant contact time.
Your written procedure for cleaning the (b)(4) and cleanroom did not specify the contact time for disinfectants.
12Facilities & equipment · 21 CFR 211.42(c)(10)(v)Written procedures did not define minor and major cleaning methods.
your written procedures did not define the minor and major cleaning methods.
13Laboratory controls & testing · 21 CFR 211.165(e)Test methods were not validated for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility.
you had not validated the test methods used for testing XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro for identity, strength, quality, and purity.
14Components & suppliers · 21 CFR 211.84(a)Components were not tested before release for use.
you lack evidence that (b)(4) media, used in production of XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro, were tested prior to release.
15Stability & expiry · 21 CFR 211.166(a)Stability testing was inadequate to support one-year expiration dating.
your firm assigned a one-year expiration date to XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro lots without adequate data regarding the stability characteristics of the products.
Additional FDA passages
5 extracted findingsSelected FDA passages, not the complete letter.
Failure to establish appropriate written procedures designed to prevent microbiological contamination of drug products purporting to be sterile, including procedures for validation of all aseptic and sterilization processes [21 CFR 211.113(b)]. For example:
Failure to establish written procedures for production and process controls designed to assure that the drug products have the identity, strength, quality, and purity they purport or are represented to possess [21 CFR 211.100(a)]. For example, the manufacturing processes for your products have not been validated.
Failure to test your non-penicillin drug products for the presence of penicillin although a reasonable possibility exists that the non-penicillin drug products have been exposed to cross contamination with penicillin [21 CFR 211.176]. For example, **(b)(4)** is one of the components in the Complete Media for your XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro products, and you have not performed testing of these products for penicillin prior to final product release.
Failure to establish an adequate system for cleaning and disinfecting the room and equipment to produce aseptic conditions [21 CFR 211.42(c)(10)(v)]. For example, at the time of the inspection:
Failure to establish and document the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of test methods [21 CFR 211.165(e)]. For example, at the time of the inspection, you had not validated the test methods used for testing XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro for identity, strength, quality, and purity.
What FDA requested
- Provide documentation showing specific steps taken to address all violations and prevent recurrence.
- Provide documentation to show matters have been addressed.
- If unable to address within 15 working days, explain reason for delay and timeframe for completion.
- If you believe products are not in violation, provide reasoning and supporting information.
FDA Warning Letter
44 paragraphs · 1 sectionText as published on FDA.gov, retrieved Sep 8, 2026. Layout added for reading; the wording is FDA’s. View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)
1Letter text
32 paragraphs
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) conducted an inspection of your firm, Kimera Labs, Inc. (hereafter “Kimera”), located at 2810 N. Commerce Parkway, Miramar, FL, between July 11, 2022 and July 21, 2022. The FDA documented that you manufacture exosome products, XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro, and an amniotic fluid product, Amnio2X®, for allogeneic use (collectively, “your products”). You have distributed your products to practitioners and medical facilities throughout the United States. Your products purport to be sterile, and your amniotic fluid product is intended for injection.
Information and records gathered prior to, during, and after the inspection, including information on your website, kimeralabs.com, reflect that your products are intended to treat various diseases or conditions. Additionally, information collected indicates your products fit within the definition of a biological product in the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) [42 U.S.C. 262(i)]. Therefore, your products are drugs as defined in section 201(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) [21 U.S.C. 321(g)] and biological products as defined in section 351(i) of the Public Health Service Act (PHS Act) [42 U.S.C. 262(i)]1.
Please be advised that to lawfully market a drug that is a biological product, a valid biologics license must be in effect [42 U.S.C. 262(a)]. Such licenses are issued only after showing that the product is safe, pure, and potent. While in the development stage, such products may be distributed for clinical use in humans only if the sponsor has an investigational new drug application (IND) in effect as specified by FDA regulations [21 U.S.C. 355(i); 42 U.S.C. 262(a)(3); 21 CFR Part 312]. None of your products are the subject of an approved biologics license application (BLA). Kimera Labs has an IND in effect for XoGlo®Pro (IND 26535) as of May 12, 2023. However, pursuant to 21 CFR 312.7(b), a sponsor or investigator shall not commercially distribute or test market an investigational new drug.2 Based on this information, your actions have violated the FD&C Act and Section 351(a) of the PHS Act.
Additionally, during the inspection, FDA investigators documented evidence of significant deviations from current good manufacturing practice (CGMP) requirements, including section 501(a)(2)(B) of the FD&C Act and 21 CFR Parts 210 and 211. At the close of the inspection, FDA investigators issued a Form FDA-483, List of Inspectional Observations, which described significant CGMP deviations applicable to your products. FDA identified additional significant deviations upon further review of the information collected during the July 2022 inspection, as discussed below. These CGMP deviations, involving over 37,000 vials manufactured between April 2020 and June 2022, include, but are not limited to, the following:
1. Failure to establish appropriate written procedures designed to prevent microbiological contamination of drug products purporting to be sterile, including procedures for validation of all aseptic and sterilization processes [21 CFR 211.113(b)]. For example:
a. Your firm has failed to validate the aseptic processes used to manufacture XoGlo®, XoGlo®Pro, and Amnio2X®. These products purport to be sterile and are expected to be sterile.
b. You have not established appropriate written procedures for environmental monitoring in the aseptic processing areas where your products are manufactured. Specifically:
i. Your written procedure for microbiological monitoring of surfaces, air, and personnel in the aseptic processing area indicates your action and alert limits for microorganisms are (b)(4) and (b)(4) CFUs, respectively.3 Your allowance for such high numbers of microorganisms could contribute to product contamination and pose a potentially significant safety concern.
ii. You have not performed non-viable particulate monitoring of the aseptic processing areas in association with each production batch. This is insufficient to detect problems and demonstrate control of the aseptic processing areas during manufacturing. Additionally, you have not established alert or action limits for particulate monitoring.
2. Written records are not always made of investigations into unexplained discrepancies or the failure of a batch or any of its components to meet specifications whether or not the batch has already been distributed [21 CFR 211.192]. Specifically, you failed to document investigations for all unexplained discrepancies or the failure of batch to meet specifications. For example, you failed to document an investigation into the positive sterility result obtained for XoGlo®Pro lot 4000078P. All (b)(4) vials of this lot were distributed.
3. Each batch of drug product purporting to be sterile and/or pyrogen-free is not laboratory tested to determine conformance to such requirements [21 CFR 211.167(a)]. For example:
a. Sterility samples of Amnio2x® are frozen prior to sterility testing. Freezing product has the potential to destroy any microbial content in the samples before testing; therefore, contamination, if present, may not be detected.
b. Your written procedure for Amnio2x® specifies testing of (b)(4) vials for sterility regardless of lot size, which may consist of as many as (b)(4) vials. This does not ensure that sterility samples are representative of the lot size.
4. Failure to establish laboratory controls that include scientifically sound and appropriate specifications, standards, sampling plans, and test procedures designed to assure that components, drug product containers, closures, in-process materials, labeling, and drug products conform to appropriate standards of identity, strength, quality, and purity [21 CFR 211.160(b)]. Specifically, you have not established scientifically sound and appropriate specifications to assure that your products conform to appropriate standards of identity, strength, quality, and purity. Your specifications are listed as “tentative.”
5. Failure to establish written procedures for production and process controls designed to assure that the drug products have the identity, strength, quality, and purity they purport or are represented to possess [21 CFR 211.100(a)]. For example, the manufacturing processes for your products have not been validated.
6. Failure to test your non-penicillin drug products for the presence of penicillin although a reasonable possibility exists that the non-penicillin drug products have been exposed to cross contamination with penicillin [21 CFR 211.176]. For example, (b)(4) is one of the components in the Complete Media for your XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro products, and you have not performed testing of these products for penicillin prior to final product release.
7. Failure to establish an adequate system for cleaning and disinfecting the room and equipment to produce aseptic conditions [21 CFR 211.42(c)(10)(v)]. For example, at the time of the inspection:
a. You failed to validate your written cleaning procedure for your laminar flow (b)(4) and your cleanrooms where your products are manufactured. Additionally, you failed to establish the effectiveness of disinfectants used in this procedure.
b. Your written procedure for cleaning the (b)(4) and cleanroom did not specify the contact time for disinfectants.
c. Your firm documented major and minor cleaning of (b)(4) and cleanrooms used in manufacturing of your products; however, your written procedures did not define the minor and major cleaning methods.
8. Failure to establish and document the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of test methods [21 CFR 211.165(e)]. For example, at the time of the inspection, you had not validated the test methods used for testing XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro for identity, strength, quality, and purity.
9. Failure to ensure that each lot of components, drug product containers, and closures are withheld from use until the lot has been sampled, tested, or examined, as appropriate, and released for use by the quality control unit [21 CFR 211.84(a)]. Specifically, your firm lacks evidence, such as testing, to demonstrate components meet all specifications of identity, strength, quality, and purity. For example, you lack evidence that (b)(4) media, used in production of XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro, were tested prior to release. Additionally, these two components are labeled “For research use only” but are incorporated into products that are injected into/used by humans.
10. Failure to establish and follow a written testing program designed to assess the stability characteristics of drug products and to use the results of such stability testing to determine appropriate storage conditions and expiration dates [21 CFR 211.166(a)]. Specifically, your firm assigned a one-year expiration date to XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro lots without adequate data regarding the stability characteristics of the products. All product used for the stability study was from (b)(4) of the XoGlo®Pro product.
Because the FDA investigators had some difficulty obtaining unredacted records, including batch records, from you during the inspection, we encourage you to review FDA Guidance for Industry, Circumstances that Constitute Delaying, Denying, Limiting, or Refusing a Drug Inspection, available at https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/circumstances-constitute-delaying-denying-limiting-or-refusing-drug-inspection4.
During the inspection, FDA investigators documented that you continued to manufacture and distribute XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro to treat diseases or conditions in humans without an approved BLA or IND in effect for those products, after FDA issued an Untitled letter to your firm in April 2020. FDA’s Untitled letter notified you that exosome products intended for such uses are regulated as drugs and biological products and are subject to premarket review and approval requirements. Although you stated during the inspection that your exosome products are for cosmetic use, you have continued to market your exosome products to treat diseases or conditions, for example, skin damage5. Therefore, these products continue to meet the definition of a drug as defined in section 201(g) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. 321(g)], and biological product as defined in section 351(i) of the PHS Act [42 U.S.C. 262(i)].
We acknowledge receipt of your correspondences, dated August 11, 2022, October 20, 2022, and February 8, 2023, responding to FDA’s inspectional observations on the FDA-483. We have reviewed their contents, and the corrective actions described in your responses are not adequate to address the above-noted violations. In your October 2022 response, you “committed to cease manufacture and distribution of Amnio2x,” and “committed to ending use of [your] (b)(4) stem cell master line to make XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro products for commercial distribution.” However, you indicated that Kimera Labs would continue to distribute the existing inventory to US practitioners until “no later than the end of (b)(4).” In a letter dated December 15, 2022, we informed you that we do not agree with your decision to continue to distribute these products without a BLA or IND in effect. Your response to FDA, received on February 8, 2023, indicated that Kimera Labs would “cease all distribution of existing batches of XoGlo and XoGlo Pro by Friday, February 10, 2023, for uses outside of” the IND that you submitted for XoGlo®Pro. Your continued distribution of your products violates the FD&C Act and PHS Act.
Furthermore, your responses do not address lots of XoGlo®, XoGlo®Pro, and Amnio2x® that were manufactured and distributed under the CGMP violations described above and may still be within expiry. We note your products carry a one-year expiration date.
With regard to your unapproved exosome products, XoGlo® and XoGlo®Pro, we direct your attention to FDA’s Public Safety Notification on Exosome Products, available at www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/public-safety-notification- exosome-products. FDA issued this public safety notification following multiple reports of serious adverse events experienced by patients who were treated with exosome products.
Neither this letter nor the observations noted on the FDA-483, which were discussed with you at the conclusion of the inspection, are intended to be an all-inclusive list of deficiencies that may exist at your facility. It is your responsibility to ensure full compliance with the FD&C Act, PHS Act, and all applicable regulations.
This letter notifies you of our findings and provides you an opportunity to address them. Failure to adequately address these matters may lead to regulatory action without further notice. Such actions may include seizure and/or injunction.
We request that you respond in writing within fifteen (15) working days from your receipt of this letter, outlining the specific steps you have taken or plan to take to address any violations and prevent their recurrence. Include any documentation necessary to show that the matters have been addressed. If you cannot address these matters within fifteen (15) working days, please explain the reason for your delay and the timeframe for completion. If you do not believe your products are in violation of the FD&C Act, PHS Act, or applicable regulations, include your reasoning and any supporting information for our consideration.
Your response should be sent to the following: Colleen Aspinwall, Compliance Officer, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Biological Products Operations – Division 1, 1515 North Federal Highway, Suite 111, Boca Raton, FL 33432 or Valerie Grecek-Trinh, Compliance Officer, U.S. Food & Drug Administration, Office of Biological Products Operations–Division 1, 400 W. Bay Street, Suite 401, Jacksonville, FL 32202 or emailed to Colleen.Aspinwall@fda.hhs.gov or Valerie.grecektrinh@fda.hhs.gov. If you should have any questions, please contact Colleen Aspinwall, Compliance Officer at 561-416-1065 ext. 1105 or Valerie Grecek-Trinh at 904-353-4560 ext. 118 or via e-mail.
Citations and trends
Each 21 CFR section, ISO 13485 clause and issue type in this letter, how often it appears across all letters, and its trend by the year FDA issued the letters. 2026 runs to Nov 3, 2026, compared with the same dates last year. Select a row or a bar to see those letters in Letters. As cited in this historical letter, not a statement of current requirements.
Regulations
Also cited: 21 CFR 312, 21 CFR 210, 21 CFR 1271
Issue types
Record details
- Issuing center
- Office of Inspections and Investigations
- Issuing office
- Division of Biological Products Operations I
- Location
- Miramar, FL, United States
- Letter posted date
- Jan 4, 2024
- Letter issue date
- Sep 1, 2023
- Addressed to
- Not recorded
- Inspection dates · model-assisted
- Jul 11, 2022 to Jul 21, 2022
- Response window
- 15 working days after receipt of this letter
Read the source clause
We request that you respond in writing within fifteen (15) working days from your receipt of this letter, outlining the specific steps you have taken or plan to take to address any violations and prevent their recurrence.
- Record length
- 2,425 words · 14 recorded redactions
- Published status
- Close-out published Jun 23, 2026
- Original letter
- View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)
- Dataset last checked
- Nov 11, 2026 · How this is built
A response window is not a calculated due date. Source excerpts are selected passages. Finding interpretations and categories are model-assisted. Verify the original letter before relying on a finding.