Chengdu Innovation Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
FDA issued a warning letter to Chengdu Innovation Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Chengdu Shi, Sichuan Sheng, China) on Feb 5, 2025. Subject: CGMP, Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API), Adulterated.
From the letter: “You manufacture APIs that were distributed to (b)(4) in the United States.”
At a glance
What a reviewer notes before reading: findings, citations, the response deadline and what the letter warns of.
- Violations
- 2 findings · 2 issue types
- Cited
- No CFR or ISO section
- Response due
- Not stated in the letter
- FDA asks for
- 5 actions
- Named as possible actions
- Import alert
- Issued by
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
- Published status
- No close-out recorded
AI assisted findings
Model-assisted reading of each issue. Open one to see the FDA text it comes from, and check it against the full letter.
01Components & suppliersThe firm failed to perform identity testing on each incoming material lot before release.
You manufacture APIs that were distributed to (b)(4) in the United States. Based on the records and information you provided, you have not demonstrated that you are adequately testing each shipment of each lot of incoming materials. Specifically in response to our request, you state that you do not perform identity testing on each shipment of each lot of incoming material before they are released for use in drug manufacturing.
02Quality unit & oversightThe quality unit failed to establish a system to approve or reject incoming materials.
The records and information you provided demonstrate that your quality unit (QU) did not effectively exercise its responsibilities to oversee the quality of your drug manufacturing operations. Specifically, your QU did not establish an appropriate system to approve or reject incoming materials.
Additional FDA passages
3 extracted findingsSelected FDA passages, not the complete letter.
Failure to test the identity of each lot of incoming production material.
Failure of your quality unit to establish a system to release or reject raw materials, intermediates, packaging, and labeling materials.
Failure to address deviations may also cause FDA to withhold issuance of Export Certificates. FDA may withhold approval of new applications or supplements listing your firm as a drug manufacturer until any deviations are completely addressed and we confirm your compliance with CGMP. We may inspect your facility to verify that you have completed corrective actions to address any deviations.
What FDA requested
- A description of how you will test each incoming material lot for conformity with all appropriate specifications for identity. If you intend to accept any results from your supplier’s certificate of analysis (COA) instead of testing each incoming material lot for other tests, specify how you will ensure that you have adequate evidence to establish that the supplier consistently provides material meeting specifications. In addition, include a commitment to always conduct at least one specific identity test for each incoming material lot.
- A comprehensive, independent review of your material system to determine whether all suppliers of incoming materials are each qualified and the materials are assigned appropriate expiration or retest dates. The review should also determine whether incoming material controls are adequate to prevent use of unsuitable materials.
- A summary of your program for qualifying and overseeing contract facilities that test the drugs you manufacture.
- A summary of results obtained from testing all incoming materials to evaluate the reliability of the COA from each incoming materials manufacturer. Include your standard operating procedure that describes this COA validation program.
- A comprehensive assessment and remediation plan to ensure your QU is given the authority and resources to effectively function. The assessment should also include, but not be limited to: o A determination of whether procedures used by your firm are robust and appropriate. o Provisions for QU oversight throughout your operations to evaluate adherence to appropriate practices. o A complete and final review of each batch and its related information before the QU disposition decision. o Oversight and approval of investigations and discharging of all other QU duties to ensure identity, quality, and purity of all products.
FDA Warning Letter
33 paragraphs · 6 sectionsText as published on FDA.gov, retrieved Oct 21, 2026. Layout added for reading; the wording is FDA’s. View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)
1Introduction
4 paragraphs
Your facility was registered with the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a manufacturer of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). FDA has reviewed the records you submitted in response to our April 29, 2024 request for records and other information pursuant to section 704(a)(4) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) for your facility, Chengdu Innovation Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., FEI 3027222600, No.123, 1st Floor, No 91 Zhongheng Street, Jinniu District, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
This warning letter summarizes significant deviations from Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) for API.
Because your methods, facilities, or controls for manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding of drugs as described in your response to our 704(a)(4) request do not conform to CGMP, your APIs are adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. 351(a)(2)(B).
Following review of records and other information provided pursuant to section 704(a)(4) of the FD&C Act, significant deviations were observed including, but not limited to, the following:
2704(a)(4) Request for Records and Related CGMP Deviations
0 paragraphs
31. Failure to test the identity of each lot of incoming production material.
7 paragraphs
You manufacture APIs that were distributed to (b)(4) in the United States. Based on the records and information you provided, you have not demonstrated that you are adequately testing each shipment of each lot of incoming materials. Specifically in response to our request, you state that you do not perform identity testing on each shipment of each lot of incoming material before they are released for use in drug manufacturing.
Without adequate testing, you do not have scientific evidence that incoming materials conform to appropriate specifications prior to use in the manufacture of your drugs. As a manufacturer, you have a responsibility to sample, test, and examine incoming materials before use in production to assure adequate quality.
In response to this letter, provide:
A description of how you will test each incoming material lot for conformity with all appropriate specifications for identity. If you intend to accept any results from your supplier’s certificate of analysis (COA) instead of testing each incoming material lot for other tests, specify how you will ensure that you have adequate evidence to establish that the supplier consistently provides material meeting specifications. In addition, include a commitment to always conduct at least one specific identity test for each incoming material lot.
A comprehensive, independent review of your material system to determine whether all suppliers of incoming materials are each qualified and the materials are assigned appropriate expiration or retest dates. The review should also determine whether incoming material controls are adequate to prevent use of unsuitable materials.
A summary of your program for qualifying and overseeing contract facilities that test the drugs you manufacture.
A summary of results obtained from testing all incoming materials to evaluate the reliability of the COA from each incoming materials manufacturer. Include your standard operating procedure that describes this COA validation program.
42. Failure of your quality unit to establish a system to release or reject raw materials, intermediates, packaging, and labeling materials.
5 paragraphs
The records and information you provided demonstrate that your quality unit (QU) did not effectively exercise its responsibilities to oversee the quality of your drug manufacturing operations. Specifically, your QU did not establish an appropriate system to approve or reject incoming materials.
Your QU is responsible for fully exercising its authority and responsibilities.
An adequate QU overseeing all elements of CGMP is necessary to consistently ensure drug quality. FDA considers the expectations outlined in ICH Q7 when determining whether API are manufactured in conformance with CGMP, including sections on quality oversight. See FDA’s guidance document Q7 Good Manufacturing Practice Guidance for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients for guidance regarding CGMP for the manufacture of API at https://www.fda.gov/media/71518/download.
In response to this letter, provide:
A comprehensive assessment and remediation plan to ensure your QU is given the authority and resources to effectively function. The assessment should also include, but not be limited to:o A determination of whether procedures used by your firm are robust and appropriate.o Provisions for QU oversight throughout your operations to evaluate adherence to appropriate practices.o A complete and final review of each batch and its related information before the QU disposition decision.o Oversight and approval of investigations and discharging of all other QU duties to ensure identity, quality, and purity of all products.
5CGMP Consultant Recommended
2 paragraphs
Based upon the nature of the deviations we identified at your firm, you should engage a consultant qualified to evaluate your operations and to assist your firm in meeting CGMP requirements. The qualified consultant should also perform a comprehensive six-system audit of your entire operation for CGMP compliance and evaluate the completion and efficacy of your corrective actions and preventive actions.
Your use of a consultant does not relieve your firm’s obligation to comply with CGMP. Your firm’s executive management remains responsible for resolving all deficiencies and systemic flaws to ensure ongoing CGMP compliance.
6Conclusion
5 paragraphs
The deviations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive list of deviations that exist at your facility. You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of any deviations and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other deviations.
FDA placed products offered for import into the United States from your firm on Import Alert 66-40 on January 17, 2025.
Correct any deviations promptly. FDA may withhold approval of new applications or supplements listing your firm as a drug manufacturer until any deviations are completely addressed and we confirm your compliance with CGMP. We may inspect to verify that you have completed corrective actions to any deviations.
Failure to address deviations may also cause FDA to withhold issuance of Export Certificates. FDA may withhold approval of new applications or supplements listing your firm as a drug manufacturer until any deviations are completely addressed and we confirm your compliance with CGMP. We may inspect your facility to verify that you have completed corrective actions to address any deviations.
This letter notifies you of our findings and provides you an opportunity to address the above deficiencies. After you receive this letter, respond to this office in writing within 30 working days. Specify what you have done to address any deviations and to prevent their recurrence. In response to this letter, you may provide additional information for our consideration as we continue to assess your activities and practices. If you cannot complete corrective actions within 15 working days, state your reasons for delay and your schedule for completion.Send your electronic reply to CDER-OC-OMQ-Communications@fda.hhs.gov. Identify your response with FEI 3027222600 and ATTN: William Yang.
Citations and trends
Each 21 CFR section, ISO 13485 clause and issue type in this letter, how often it appears across all letters, and its trend by the year FDA issued the letters. 2026 runs to Nov 3, 2026, compared with the same dates last year. Select a row or a bar to see those letters in Letters. As cited in this historical letter, not a statement of current requirements.
This letter cites no 21 CFR section or ISO 13485 clause.
Issue types
Record details
- Issuing center
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
- Issuing office
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
- Location
- Chengdu Shi, Sichuan Sheng, China
- Letter posted date
- Feb 11, 2025
- Letter issue date
- Feb 5, 2025
- Addressed to
- Not recorded
- Inspection dates
- Not recorded
- Response window
- Not verified in this snapshot. Consult the original letter.
- Record length
- 1,118 words · 1 recorded redactions
- Published status
- No published close-out
- FDA reference
- 320-25-40
- Original letter
- View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)
- Dataset last checked
- Nov 11, 2026 · How this is built
A response window is not a calculated due date. Source excerpts are selected passages. Finding interpretations and categories are model-assisted. Verify the original letter before relying on a finding.