Drugs

Chem-Tech, Ltd.

FDA issued a warning letter to Chem-Tech, Ltd. (Pleasantville, IA, United States) on Feb 11, 2025, citing 21 CFR 211.192, 21 CFR 211.110, 21 CFR 211.67 and 21 CFR 211.22. Subject: CGMP, Finished Pharmaceuticals, Adulterated.

From the letter: “Your firm failed to conduct adequate manufacturing investigations into out-of-specification (OOS) results obtained by your external laboratory for your (b)(4), an over-the-counter (OTC) drug product.”

Pleasantville, IA, United StatesIssued Feb 11, 2025Posted Mar 4, 2025No close-out recorded

At a glance

What a reviewer notes before reading: findings, citations, the response deadline and what the letter warns of.

Violations
6 findings · 4 issue types
Response due
Not stated in the letter
FDA asks for
4 actions
Named as possible actions
Seizure, injunction
Issued by
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Published status
No close-out recorded

AI assisted findings

Model-assisted reading of each issue. Open one to see the FDA text it comes from, and check it against the full letter.

01Investigations & OOS · 21 CFR 211.192The firm failed to adequately investigate OOS assay results from its external laboratory, failing to determine root causes or identify CAPA.
Your firm failed to conduct adequate manufacturing investigations into out-of-specification (OOS) results obtained by your external laboratory for your (b)(4), an over-the-counter (OTC) drug product. As such, root cause(s) for the OOS results were not determined and no corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) were identified.
02Production & process controls · 21 CFR 211.110(a)The firm lacks scientifically supported mixing process validation and finished product hold time studies.
In addition, your firm lacks mixing process validation and finished product hold time studies that are scientifically supported, as required by 21 CFR 211.110(a).
03Facilities & equipment · 21 CFR 211.67(a)The firm failed to clean, maintain, and sanitize equipment and utensils at appropriate intervals and lacked adequate written cleaning procedures.
Your firm failed to clean, maintain, and sanitize and/or sterilize equipment and utensils at appropriate intervals to prevent malfunctions or contamination that would alter the safety, identity, strength, quality, or purity of the drug product beyond the official or other established requirements, and you failed to establish and follow adequate written procedures for cleaning and maintenance of equipment (21 CFR 211.67(a) and (b)).
04Facilities & equipmentThe firm failed to maintain the facility in a good state of repair, with dirt and a dead insect observed on the mixing tank lid.
The investigator observed a layer of dirt and a dead insect on the lid of your mixing tank that was only partially covered by a plastic sheet.
05Facilities & equipmentThe firm lacked a validated cleaning procedure and a preventive maintenance program, and a water meter was never calibrated.
You have no validated cleaning procedure to demonstrate that this is sufficient to clean your equipment. Your firm also lacked a preventive maintenance program with procedures for maintenance and cleaning of equipment. For example, we noted that the meter used to charge potable water into the drug product has never been calibrated.
06Quality unit & oversight · 21 CFR 211.22(d)The firm's quality unit failed to have procedures for GMP training, handling OOS results, and change management, and its deviation and complaint procedures were inadequate.
Your firm’s quality unit failed to have procedures for GMP training, handling OOS results, and change management. In addition, the procedures for handling deviations and complaints are inadequate.

Additional FDA passages

4 extracted findings

Selected FDA passages, not the complete letter.

01

Your firm failed to thoroughly investigate any unexplained discrepancy or failure of a batch or any of its components to meet any of its specifications, whether or not the batch has already been distributed (21 CFR 211.192).

02

Your firm failed to conduct adequate manufacturing investigations into out-of-specification (OOS) results obtained by your external laboratory for your **(b)(4)**, an over-the-counter (OTC) drug product. As such, root cause(s) for the OOS results were not determined and no corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) were identified.

03

Your firm failed to establish adequate written responsibilities and procedures applicable to the quality control unit and to follow written procedures applicable to the quality control unit (21 CFR 211.22(d)).

04

Failure to address violations may also cause FDA to withhold issuance of Export Certificates. FDA may withhold approval of new applications or supplements listing your firm as a drug manufacturer until any violations are completely addressed and we confirm your compliance with CGMP. We may re-inspect to verify that you have completed corrective actions to address any violations.

What FDA requested

  • Engage a qualified consultant to evaluate operations and assist in meeting CGMP requirements.
  • Perform a comprehensive six-system audit of the entire operation for CGMP compliance.
  • Evaluate completion and efficacy of corrective and preventive actions before pursuing resolution.
  • Notify the office if resuming drug manufacturing and provide a summary of remediations.

FDA Warning Letter

41 paragraphs · 6 sections

Text as published on FDA.gov, retrieved Oct 21, 2026. Layout added for reading; the wording is FDA’s. View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)

DatedFebruary 11, 2025
AddressedDear Mr. Archer

1Introduction

17 paragraphs

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected your drug manufacturing facility, Chem-Tech, Ltd., FEI 1927341, at 1006 Business Highway 5, Pleasantville, IA, from September 17 to 20, 2024.

This warning letter summarizes significant violations of Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) regulations for finished pharmaceuticals. See Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations, parts 210 and 211 (21 CFR, parts 210 and 211).

Because your methods, facilities, or controls for manufacturing, processing, packing, or holding do not conform to CGMP, your drug product is adulterated within the meaning of section 501(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. 351(a)(2)(B).

We reviewed your October 11, 2024, response to our Form FDA 483 in detail. Your response is inadequate because you failed to provide supportive documentation for evaluation or adequate evidence of corrective actions taken to bring your operations into compliance with CGMP.

During our inspection, our investigator observed specific violations including, but not limited to, the following.

1. Your firm failed to thoroughly investigate any unexplained discrepancy or failure of a batch or any of its components to meet any of its specifications, whether or not the batch has already been distributed (21 CFR 211.192).

Your firm failed to conduct adequate manufacturing investigations into out-of-specification (OOS) results obtained by your external laboratory for your (b)(4), an over-the-counter (OTC) drug product. As such, root cause(s) for the OOS results were not determined and no corrective and preventive actions (CAPA) were identified.

For example,

Batch (b)(4) reported (b)(4) assay for (b)(4) content of 0.423% (specification, (b)(4)). Despite no supportive documentation from an investigation, you identified a separation issue as the root cause for the OOS result and failed to consider the batch was also outside the established (b)(4) hold time. The batch was reworked to adjust the (b)(4) content and released on March 22, 2022.

Batch (b)(4) reported a (b)(4) assay for (b)(4) content of 0.246% (specification (b)(4)). Your deviation report indicated that the OOS was due to improper mixing without a full manufacturing investigation. You mixed the batch for (b)(4) as the corrective action. The batch was retested for assay and upon passing, the batch was released on July 7, 2023.

In addition, your firm lacks mixing process validation and finished product hold time studies that are scientifically supported, as required by 21 CFR 211.110(a). For example, your validation report only includes the filling operation and does not include mixing parameters. The holding time was initially established as (b)(4) and changed to (b)(4) without supporting data. There is evidence that (b)(4) batch (b)(4) was held for up to 120 days prior to filling without additional testing. The extended hold time of the finished drug product and inadequate validation of the process may contribute to both the high- and low-OOS assay results reported, and your cursory investigation lacked appropriate CAPA.

Without adequate manufacturing investigations, you lack sufficient evidence to determine if the process is contributing to the OOS results obtained. As a manufacturer, you have a responsibility to fully investigate OOS results and process deviations that may impact product quality.

For more information about process validation and handling failing, OOS, out-of-trend, or other unexpected results and documentation of your investigations, see FDA’s guidance documents: Process Validation: General Principles and Practices at https://www.fda.gov/media/71021/download and Investigating Out-of-Specification (OOS) Test Results for Pharmaceutical Production at https://www.fda.gov/media/158416/download.

2. Your firm failed to clean, maintain, and sanitize and/or sterilize equipment and utensils at appropriate intervals to prevent malfunctions or contamination that would alter the safety, identity, strength, quality, or purity of the drug product beyond the official or other established requirements, and you failed to establish and follow adequate written procedures for cleaning and maintenance of equipment (21 CFR 211.67(a) and (b)).

You failed to maintain your drug manufacturing facility in a good state of repair. For example, your mixing tank and filling lines for your OTC drug product are in a large, unclean area. The investigator observed a layer of dirt and a dead insect on the lid of your mixing tank that was only partially covered by a plastic sheet. It is essential your facility is in a good state of repair, and sanitary conditions are maintained to ensure ongoing suitability for drug manufacturing and to protect the product from contamination.

Additionally, the investigator observed leftover drug product pooled at the bottom of your mixing tank, along with orange-red discoloration on the inside walls and bottom of the mixing tank. You had last manufactured drug products on this equipment approximately 1 month prior and that you would (b)(4) and (b)(4) prior to starting a new manufacturing run. You have no validated cleaning procedure to demonstrate that this is sufficient to clean your equipment.

Your firm also lacked a preventive maintenance program with procedures for maintenance and cleaning of equipment. For example, we noted that the meter used to charge potable water into the drug product has never been calibrated.

23. Your firm failed to establish adequate written responsibilities and procedures applicable to the quality control unit and to follow written procedures applicable to the quality control unit (21 CFR 211.22(d)).

2 paragraphs

Your firm’s quality unit failed to have procedures for GMP training, handling OOS results, and change management. In addition, the procedures for handling deviations and complaints are inadequate. For example, the deviations procedure lacks details for the investigation process, and the complaints procedure states they are managed by your firm’s only customer but lacks information about how your customer will communicate when complaints are received, the outcome, and any needed actions including CAPA.

Your firm’s quality systems are inadequate. See FDA’s guidance document Quality Systems Approach to Pharmaceutical CGMP Regulations for help implementing quality systems and risk management approaches to meet the requirements of CGMP regulations 21 CFR, parts 210 and 211 at https://www.fda.gov/media/71023/download.

3Drug Recall

1 paragraph

On (b)(4), you issued a voluntary recall of (b)(4) due to GMP violations cited after the inspection conducted from September 17 to 20, 2024. The company announcement was posted to the FDA website: (b)(4)

4Drug Production Ceased

2 paragraphs

We acknowledge your commitment to cease production of (b)(4) drug at this facility.

If you plan to resume any drug manufacturing operations, notify this office. You are responsible for resolving all deficiencies and systemic flaws to ensure your firm is capable of ongoing CGMP compliance. In your notification to the Agency, provide a summary of your remediations to demonstrate that you have appropriately completed all CAPA.

5CGMP Consultant Recommended

2 paragraphs

Based upon the nature of the violations we identified at your firm, you should engage a consultant qualified as set forth in 21 CFR 211.34 to evaluate your operations and to assist your firm in meeting CGMP requirements if your firm intends to resume manufacturing drugs for the U.S. market. The qualified consultant should also perform a comprehensive six-system audit1 of your entire operation for CGMP compliance and evaluate the completion and efficacy of your corrective actions and preventive actions before you pursue resolution of your firm’s compliance status with FDA.

Your use of a consultant does not relieve your firm’s obligation to comply with CGMP. Your firm’s executive management remains responsible for resolving all deficiencies and systemic flaws to ensure ongoing CGMP compliance.

6Conclusion

5 paragraphs

The violations cited in this letter are not intended to be an all-inclusive list of violations that exist at your facility. You are responsible for investigating and determining the causes of any violations and for preventing their recurrence or the occurrence of other violations.

Correct any violations promptly. Failure to promptly and adequately address this matter may result in regulatory or legal action without further notice including, without limitation, seizure, and injunction. Unresolved violations may also prevent other Federal agencies from awarding contracts.

Failure to address violations may also cause FDA to withhold issuance of Export Certificates. FDA may withhold approval of new applications or supplements listing your firm as a drug manufacturer until any violations are completely addressed and we confirm your compliance with CGMP. We may re-inspect to verify that you have completed corrective actions to address any violations.

This letter notifies you of our findings and provides you an opportunity to address the above deficiencies. After you receive this letter, respond to this office in writing within 15 working days. Specify what you have done to address any violations and to prevent their recurrence. In response to this letter, you may provide additional information for our consideration as we continue to assess your activities and practices. If you cannot complete corrective actions within 15 working days, state your reasons for delay and your schedule for completion.

Send your electronic reply to CDER-OC-OMQ-Communications@fda.hhs.gov. Identify your response with FEI 1927341 and ATTN: Vilmary Negrón Rodríguez.

Sincerely,/S/

Francis GodwinDirectorOffice of Manufacturing QualityOffice of ComplianceCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research

_____________________

1 i.e. Quality System, Facilities & Equipment System, Materials System, Production System, Packaging & Labeling System, and Laboratory Control System per FDA’s guidance document Quality Systems Approach to Pharmaceutical CGMP Regulations.

Citations and trends

Each 21 CFR section, ISO 13485 clause and issue type in this letter, how often it appears across all letters, and its trend by the year FDA issued the letters. 2026 runs to Nov 3, 2026, compared with the same dates last year. Select a row or a bar to see those letters in Letters. As cited in this historical letter, not a statement of current requirements.

Regulations

Issue types

Investigations & OOSAI-assigned issue type199letters1finding here
46 letters issued this year vs 33 by the same date last year · +39%

Record details

Issuing center
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Issuing office
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
Location
Pleasantville, IA, United States
Letter posted date
Mar 4, 2025
Letter issue date
Feb 11, 2025
Addressed to
General Manager
Inspection dates
Sep 17, 2024
Response window
Not verified in this snapshot. Consult the original letter.
Record length
1,494 words · 22 recorded redactions
Published status
No published close-out
FDA reference
320-25-44
Original letter
View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)
Dataset last checked
Nov 11, 2026 · How this is built

A response window is not a calculated due date. Source excerpts are selected passages. Finding interpretations and categories are model-assisted. Verify the original letter before relying on a finding.

See the pattern across 1,707 lettersFind letters like this →
Keep exploring

More drug letters

Recent records for the same product type. Your previous filters remain available when you return.

Keep exploring

Find letters like this →
For regulated teams

Put this kind of reading to
work on your own records.

Botable builds and runs a custom AI layer around the software you already use, so your team can do the job you hired them for.

Every letter by dateHow this database is built

FDA Warning Letter Alerts

Share this view

Send the same filters, search and view to a colleague.

You choose what to post or send. Sharing a link does not change access to this site.