Blue Willow Biologics
FDA issued a warning letter to Blue Willow Biologics (Ann Arbor, MI, United States) on Aug 3, 2021, citing 21 CFR 201.128. Subject: Unapproved New Drug Products Related to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
From the letter: “This product is an unapproved new drug introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce in violation of section 505(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. § 355(a).”
At a glance
What a reviewer notes before reading: findings, citations, the response deadline and what the letter warns of.
- Violations
- 8 findings · 2 issue types
- Cited
- 21 CFR 201.128
- Response due
- Not stated in the letter
- FDA asks for
- 3 actions
- Named as possible actions
- Seizure, injunction, detention, refusal of admission
- Issued by
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
- Published status
- No close-out recorded
AI assisted findings
Model-assisted reading of each issue. Open one to see the FDA text it comes from, and check it against the full letter.
01Registration, listing & premarketThe product is an unapproved new drug marketed without FDA approval, in violation of FD&C Act sections 505(a) and 301(d).
This product is an unapproved new drug introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce in violation of section 505(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. § 355(a).
02Labeling, claims & marketingThe product is misbranded under FD&C Act section 502(a) because its labeling is false or misleading, claiming adherence to the OTC monograph system.
This consumer topical antiseptic product was also misbranded under section 502(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C 352(a), because the labeling was false or misleading. Specifically, labeling for this product claimed that the product “adheres to the OTC monograph system for topical skin antiseptics.” As noted above, this product does not meet the conditions under section 505G(a)(3) of the FD&C Act for marketing without an approved application under section 505.
03Labeling, claims & marketingThe product is misbranded under FD&C Act section 502(ee) because it is a nonprescription drug subject to section 505G but does not comply with its requirements.
This consumer topical antiseptic products is also misbranded under section 502(ee) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 352(ee), because it is a nonprescription drug subject to section 505G of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355h, but does not comply with the requirements for marketing under that section and is not the subject of an application approved under section 505 of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355.
04Labeling, claims & marketingThe product's labeling and website claims establish intended use for COVID-19 treatment or prevention, making it a drug under FD&C Act sections 201(g)(1)(B) and (C).
Based on the above claims, your topical antiseptic product is a drug as defined by section 201(g)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B), because it is intended for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, and/or under section 201(g)(1)(C) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(C), because it is intended to affect the structure or any function of the body.
05Registration, listing & premarketThe product is a new drug not generally recognized as safe and effective, and no approved application is in effect.
This consumer topical antiseptic is a “new drug” within the meaning of section 201(p) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 321(p), because it is not generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE) for use under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its labeling.
06Labeling, claims & marketingThe product does not conform to the 1994 TFM or the 2016 Consumer Antiseptic Rubs Proposed Rule, and its claims go beyond permitted uses.
However, your consumer topical antiseptic product does not conform to the 1994 TFM, as further amended by the 2016 Consumer Antiseptic Rubs Proposed Rule, nor any other TFM, proposed rule, or final rule, and does not meet the conditions under section 505G(a)(3) of the FD&C Act for marketing without an approved application under section 505.
07Labeling, claims & marketingThe product's labeling claims of extended efficacy and protection against serious pathogens are not supported and endanger public health.
Your claims on the product label, suggesting your consumer antiseptic provides all day efficacy against infection, and your claims on your websites, which suggested all day protection against serious-disease related pathogens including the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, do not conform to the 1994 TFM or any of the amendments to the TFM discussed above. Time-specific extended efficacy claims, especially when related to serious-disease related pathogens, endanger the public health by creating a false sense of security for the general public that may result in infrequent hand washing or the substitution of these products for protective gloves and clothing, which are the principal methods for protecting against the spread of diseases caused by pathogenic microorganisms.
08Labeling, claims & marketingThe product is intended for application inside and around the nostrils, which is not permitted under the TFM.
In addition, according to the product labeling, NanoBio Protect Nasal Antiseptic Solution is intended to be applied inside and around the nostrils. Consumer antiseptic products intended for administration inside and around the nostrils are not permitted under the 1994 TFM, as further amended by the 2016 Consumer Antiseptic Rubs Proposed
What FDA requested
- Send an email to COVID-19-Task-Force-CDER@fda.hhs.gov within 48 hours describing the specific steps taken to prevent recurrence of future violations.
- If corrective action cannot be completed within 48 hours, state the reason for the delay and the time within which corrections will be completed.
- If you believe your products are not in violation, include your reasoning and supporting information for consideration.
FDA Warning Letter
40 paragraphs · 2 sectionsText as published on FDA.gov, retrieved Oct 17, 2026. Layout added for reading; the wording is FDA’s. View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)
1WARNING LETTER
4 paragraphs
Date: August 3, 2021 RE: Unapproved New Drug Products Related to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
This is to advise you that the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had reviewed your websites at the Internet addresses https://nanobioprotect.com and https://bluewillow.com on March 24, 2021. The FDA observed that your websites offered a non-alcohol-based consumer antiseptic nasal product1 for sale in the United States and that this product was intended to mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose, or cure COVID-192 and other conditions in people. FDA also observed that your product is for sale in the United States on other websites, including at https://www.cvs.com/shop/nanobio-protect-nasal-antiseptic-prodid-160333. Based on our review, this product is an unapproved new drug introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce in violation of section 505(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), 21 U.S.C. § 355(a). Furthermore, this product is a misbranded drug under sections 502(a) and (ee) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 352(a) and (ee). Introduction or delivery for introduction of such a product into interstate commerce violated sections 301(a) and (d) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 331(a) and (d). These violations are described in more detail below.
There is currently a global outbreak of respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus that has been named “severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2” (SARS-CoV-2). The disease caused by the virus has been named “Coronavirus Disease 2019” (COVID-19). On January 31, 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a declaration of a public health emergency related to COVID-19 and mobilized the Operating Divisions of HHS.3 In addition, on March 13, 2020, there was a Presidential declaration of a national emergency in response to COVID-19.4 Therefore, FDA is taking urgent measures to protect consumers from certain products that, without approval or authorization by FDA, claim to mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose, or cure COVID-19 in people. As described below, you sold an unapproved and unauthorized product that was intended to mitigate, prevent, treat, diagnose, or cure COVID-19 and other conditions in people.
Some examples of the claims on your product label that establish the intended use of your product (as defined in 21 CFR 201.128) and examples of the claims on your website that established the intended use of your product and misleadingly represented it as safe and/or effective for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 and other serious infections include, but may not be limited to, the following:
2NanoBioProtect.com and Bluewillow.com websites and NanoBio Protect Nasal Antiseptic label:
25 paragraphs
NanoBio® Protect Over-The-Counter Nasal Antiseptic Kills COVID-19 Virus in Lab Tests.” [from your website https://bluewillow.com/%ef%bb%bf%ef%bb%bfnanobio-protect-over-the-counter-nasal-antiseptic-kills-covid-19-virus-in-lab-tests/]
“Recent studies conducted by Public Health England also demonstrate NanoBio® Protect’s ability to kill COVID-19 virus in laboratory test.” [from your website https://bluewillow.com/nanobio-protect/]
“NanoBio Protect . . . Protects for up to 8 hours . . . Kills 99.99% of germs on contact . . . Reduces the risk of respiratory infection ….” [from your website https://nanobioprotect.com/]
“KILLS GERMS THAT ENTER THE NOSE . . . PROTECTS FOR 8 HOURS . . .NEXT-LEVEL PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION” [from your product label]
“Get protection from infection that lasts all day.” [from your website https://nanobioprotect.com/]
“NanoBio Protect offers next-level protection to help keep you and your family healthy. It is the only alcohol-free nasal antiseptic proven to kill 99.99% of infection-causing germs when applied to the skin in and around the nose. . . NanoBio Protect uses patented, natural-oil nanodroplets that deliver the antiseptic directly to the surface of germs, killing them on contact. Uniquely, the nanodroplets remain active on the skin after application for up to 8 hours (in lab testing), providing lasting protection against the germs that cause infection.” [from your website https://nanobioprotect.com/frequently-asked-questions/]
“NanoBio Protect adds BZK antiseptic to the surface of nanodroplets. This technology offers four distinct advantages over conventional BZK antiseptics:
The Nanodroplets optimize the ability of the antiseptic to kill germs. The droplets sit on skin after application, enabling protection for up to 8 hours (in lab testing) . . .” [from your website https://nanobioprotect.com/frequently-asked-questions/]
“Is NanoBio Protect US FDA regulated? Yes. NanoBio® Protect nasal antiseptic adheres to the OTC monograph system for topical skin antiseptics. In testing by independent FDA registered laboratories, NanoBio® Protect was shown to kill 99.99% of a broad spectrum of pathogenic organisms. To learn more, visit https://bluewillow.com/nanobio-protect/.” [from your website https://nanobioprotect.com/frequently-asked-questions/]
We note that, as of the date of this letter, some of the claims cited above appear to have been removed. Due to the serious public health concerns related to the marketing and sale of unapproved drugs for the mitigation, prevention, treatment, diagnosis, or cure of COVID-19, it is essential that these violations do not recur.
Based on the above claims, your topical antiseptic product is a drug as defined by section 201(g)(1)(B) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B), because it is intended for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, and/or under section 201(g)(1)(C) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(C), because it is intended to affect the structure or any function of the body. Specifically, your product is intended for use as a consumer topical antiseptic.
This consumer topical antiseptic is a “new drug” within the meaning of section 201(p) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 321(p), because it is not generally recognized as safe and effective (GRASE) for use under the conditions prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its labeling. New drugs may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce without prior approval from FDA, as described in section 505(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355(a), unless they are lawfully marketed under section 505G of the FD&C Act (which is not the case for this product, as further described below) or under other exceptions not applicable here. No FDA-approved application pursuant to section 505 of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355, is in effect for this drug product, nor are we aware of any adequate and well-controlled clinical studies in the published literature that support a determination that your NanoBio Protect Nasal Antiseptic Solution product is GRASE for use under the conditions suggested, recommended, or prescribed in its labeling. Accordingly, this product is an unapproved new drug marketed in violation of sections 505(a) and 301(d) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C 355(a) and 331(d).
We note that over-the-counter (OTC) topical antiseptic products had been the subject of rulemaking under the Agency’s OTC Drug Review. In particular, such products were addressed in a tentative final monograph (TFM) entitled “Topical Antimicrobial Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Tentative Final Monograph for Health-Care Antiseptic Drug Products,” Proposed Rule, 59 FR 31402 (June 17, 1994) (1994 TFM), as further amended by “Safety and Effectiveness of Consumer Antiseptics; Topical Antimicrobial Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Proposed Amendment of the Tentative Final Monograph; Reopening of Administrative Record,” Proposed Rule, 81 FR 42912 (June 30, 2016)(Consumer Antiseptic Rubs Proposed Rule). Over the course of these rulemakings, three active ingredients (benzalkonium chloride, ethyl alcohol (ethanol), and isopropyl alcohol) were classified as Category III for use in consumer antiseptic rub products, meaning that additional safety and effectiveness data are needed to support a determination that a drug product containing one of these active ingredients would be GRASE for use as a consumer antiseptic rub.
Section 505G of the FD&C Act addresses nonprescription drugs marketed without an approved application. Under section 505G(a)(3) of the FD&C Act, drugs that were classified as Category III for safety or effectiveness in a TFM that is the most recently applicable proposal or determination for such drug issued under 21 CFR Part 330 – and that were not classified as Category II for safety or effectiveness – are not required to have an approved application under section 505 in order to be marketed, as long as they are in conformity with the relevant conditions of use outlined in the applicable TFM, including the active ingredient, and comply with all other applicable requirements.
However, your consumer topical antiseptic product does not conform to the 1994 TFM, as further amended by the 2016 Consumer Antiseptic Rubs Proposed Rule, nor any other TFM, proposed rule, or final rule, and does not meet the conditions under section 505G(a)(3) of the FD&C Act for marketing without an approved application under section 505.
Specifically, your labeling claims suggesting and depicting that your topical antiseptic product is effective in preventing infection or disease go beyond merely describing the general intended use of consumer antiseptics as set forth in the 1994 TFM.5 Your claims on the product label, suggesting your consumer antiseptic provides all day efficacy against infection, and your claims on your websites, which suggested all day protection against serious-disease related pathogens including the novel coronavirus that causes COVID-19, do not conform to the 1994 TFM or any of the amendments to the TFM discussed above. Time-specific extended efficacy claims, especially when related to serious-disease related pathogens, endanger the public health by creating a false sense of security for the general public that may result in infrequent hand washing or the substitution of these products for protective gloves and clothing, which are the principal methods for protecting against the spread of diseases caused by pathogenic microorganisms. As a result, this product may have given users the false impression that they need not rigorously adhere to interventions such as social distancing and exercising good hygienic practices that have been demonstrated to curb the spread of COVID-19. Users who did not follow these interventions were at increased risk for contracting COVID-19 and for spreading disease if they had been exposed to the virus, thereby prolonging the pandemic, and increasing its associated morbidity and mortality. In addition, according to the product labeling, NanoBio Protect Nasal Antiseptic Solution is intended to be applied inside and around the nostrils. Consumer antiseptic products intended for administration inside and around the nostrils are not permitted under the 1994 TFM, as further amended by the 2016 Consumer Antiseptic Rubs Proposed Rule6.
We are unaware of any adequate and well-controlled clinical studies in the published literature that support a determination that your consumer topical antiseptic product is GRASE for the above-described intended uses, including the time-specific extended efficacy claims. Accordingly, your consumer topical antiseptic product is a new drug under section 201(p) of the FD&C Act. In addition, there are no FDA-approved applications in effect for your consumer topical antiseptic product and, accordingly, it is an unapproved new drug sold in violation of sections 505(a) and 301(d) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C §§ 355(a) and 331(d). We note that your consumer topical antiseptic product also does not conform to any temporary policy FDA has implemented for alcohol-based hand sanitizer products during the public health emergency.7
This consumer topical antiseptic product was also misbranded under section 502(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C 352(a), because the labeling was false or misleading. Specifically, labeling for this product claimed that the product “adheres to the OTC monograph system for topical skin antiseptics.” As noted above, this product does not meet the conditions under section 505G(a)(3) of the FD&C Act for marketing without an approved application under section 505.
This consumer topical antiseptic products is also misbranded under section 502(ee) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 352(ee), because it is a nonprescription drug subject to section 505G of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355h, but does not comply with the requirements for marketing under that section and is not the subject of an application approved under section 505 of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 355.
The introduction or delivery for introduction of a misbranded drug into interstate commerce is prohibited under section 301(a) of the FD&C Act, 21 U.S.C. 331(a).
You should take immediate action to address the violations cited in this letter. This letter is not meant to be an all-inclusive list of violations that exist in connection with your products or operations. It is your responsibility to ensure that the products you sell are in compliance with the FD&C Act and FDA's implementing regulations. We advise you to review your websites, product labels, and other labeling and promotional materials to ensure that you are not misleadingly representing your products as safe and effective for a COVID-19-related use for which they have not been approved by FDA and that you do not make claims that misbrand the products in violation of the FD&C Act. Within 48 hours, please send an email to COVID-19-Task-Force-CDER@fda.hhs.gov describing the specific steps you have taken to prevent the recurrence of future violations. Failure to adequately correct any violations may result in legal action, including, without limitation, seizure, and injunction.
FDA is advising consumers not to purchase or use certain products that have not been approved, cleared, or authorized by FDA and that are being misleadingly represented as safe and/or effective for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19. Your firm will be added to a published list on FDA’s website of firms and websites that have received warning letters from FDA concerning the sale or distribution of COVID-19 related products in violation of the FD&C Act, with a notation that, as of the date of this letter, your firm’s listed products are no longer sold for the prevention, treatment, mitigation, diagnosis or cure of COVID-19. This list can be found at http://www.fda.gov/consumers/health-fraud-scams/fraudulent-coronavirus-disease-covid-19-products.Corrective actions taken to address the sale of your unapproved and unauthorized product for the mitigation, prevention, treatment, diagnosis, or cure of COVID-19, and any appropriate corrective actions have to be confirmed by the FDA, for the published list to be updated to indicate that your firm has taken such corrective actions.
This letter notifies you of our concerns and provides you with an opportunity to address them. If you cannot complete corrective action within 48 hours, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the corrections. If you believe that your products are not in violation of the FD&C Act, include your reasoning and any supporting information for our consideration.
If you are not located in the United States, please note that products that appear to be misbranded or unapproved new drugs are subject to detention and refusal of admission if they are offered for importation into the United States. We may advise the appropriate regulatory officials in the country from which you operate that FDA considers your product(s) referenced above to be unapproved and misbranded products that cannot be legally sold to consumers in the United States.
Please direct any inquiries to FDA at COVID-19-Task-Force-CDER@fda.hhs.gov.
Citations and trends
Each 21 CFR section, ISO 13485 clause and issue type in this letter, how often it appears across all letters, and its trend by the year FDA issued the letters. 2026 runs to Nov 3, 2026, compared with the same dates last year. Select a row or a bar to see those letters in Letters. As cited in this historical letter, not a statement of current requirements.
Regulations
Also cited: 21 CFR 330
Issue types
Record details
- Issuing center
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
- Issuing office
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
- Location
- Ann Arbor, MI, United States
- Letter posted date
- Aug 4, 2021
- Letter issue date
- Aug 3, 2021
- Addressed to
- President and Chief Executive Officer
- Inspection dates
- Not recorded
- Response window
- Not verified in this snapshot. Consult the original letter.
- Record length
- 2,674 words · 0 recorded redactions
- Published status
- No published close-out
- Original letter
- View on FDA.gov (opens in a new tab)
- Dataset last checked
- Nov 11, 2026 · How this is built
A response window is not a calculated due date. Source excerpts are selected passages. Finding interpretations and categories are model-assisted. Verify the original letter before relying on a finding.