Process Risk Assessment

‍Process Risk Assessment (PRA) is the methodology used within a Quality Management System (QMS) to systematically identify, analyze, evaluate, and control potential risks and opportunities associated with the operational processes (activities, methods, or procedures) required to deliver a product or service.

Process Risk Assessment is the application of risk-based thinking to an organization's internal activities (e.g., manufacturing, auditing, training, purchasing) to prevent or reduce undesirable outcomes (such as nonconformity, process failure, or deviation), thereby making the entire QMS function as a preventive tool.

Process Risk Assessment is crucial because it transforms quality management from a reactive system (fixing mistakes) to a proactive one (preventing potential mistakes) by integrating risk analysis directly into the flow of operations.

Foundation in Risk-Based Thinking and the Process Approach

Process Risk Assessment is a natural convergence of two fundamental principles of ISO-based QMS: the Process Approach and Risk-Based Thinking.

Process Approach: The Process Approach (one of the seven Quality Management Principles) suggests that desired results are achieved more efficiently when activities and related resources are managed as a process. The organization must define the inputs, outputs, sequence, and interaction of its processes.

Risk-Based Thinking: The ISO 9001 standard requires organizations to employ risk-based thinking and the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle throughout the QMS. When planning for the QMS, the organization must plan actions to address risks and opportunities. Furthermore, for each process required for the QMS, the organization shall determine how to address the risks and opportunities associated with those processes.

Preventive Tool: Risk-based thinking makes the whole management system function as a preventive tool. This helps to prevent or reduce undesired effects and facilitates proactive actions to achieve positive results.

Mandatory Application in Medical Device Processes

For medical device manufacturers, the assessment of process risks is explicitly required through various regulations and standards, ensuring that manufacturing and support functions do not compromise safety.

Supplier Processes: Suppliers of medical device components are often required to demonstrate risk mitigation of process risk per ISO 14971. This frequently involves using tools like the pFMEA (Process Failure Mode Effect Analysis), or other relevant risk management tools.

Production and Process Controls: Manufacturers must establish and maintain procedures for Production and Process Controls. These controls include monitoring and control of process parameters during production. If changes occur to a specification, method, or process, they must be verified or validated before implementation.

Validation of Unverifiable Processes: For processes or outsourced sub-processes that cannot be fully verified by subsequent inspection or test methods (e.g., welding, sterilization, heat treating), the manufacturer (and its suppliers) must establish a validation process. Process validation requires establishing by objective evidence that a process consistently produces a result meeting its predetermined specifications.

Post-Market Monitoring: The overall CAPA system, which includes Preventive Action (PA), requires the analysis of quality data concerning processes and work operations to identify the causes of nonconforming product or other quality problems. This aims to ensure systemic issues do not recur and proactively implements measures to reduce future quality issues and risks.

Key Methodologies and Tools for Process Risk Assessment

Process Risk Assessment relies on structured methodologies designed to analyze potential failures within a system or process flow.

FMEA and Hazard Analysis: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is identified as a cornerstone of risk management in the medical device industry. It plays a pivotal role in early identification and mitigation of potential failure modes. Manufacturers use FMEA tools to identify and mitigate potential quality risks in manufacturing processes.

• Specific regulatory documentation for certain IVD devices requires risk analysis and management strategies, such as FMEA and/or Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points summaries, and their impact on test performance.

Proactive Intervention: Using real-time monitoring and analytics allows machine learning algorithms to analyze process data and predict potential quality issues before they occur, enabling proactive intervention.

Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA): The results of process risk analysis directly inform the CAPA system, particularly the Preventive Action (PA) function, which takes proactive measures to identify and eliminate potential nonconformities before they happen.

Analogy for Understanding Process Risk Assessment

If Design Risk Analysis is scrutinizing the blueprints of an airplane to ensure the placement of the wings is inherently safe, Process Risk Assessment is rigorously auditing the assembly line itself. You are not checking the design parameters, but rather the process steps: What if the wrench used to tighten a critical bolt is calibrated incorrectly? (Equipment/Measurement risk) What if the new trainee uses the wrong lubricant on the engine components? (Training/Human Factors risk) What if the welding machine parameter drifts outside the validated temperature range? (Process Control risk). PRA proactively finds these potential procedural failures (e.g., via pFMEA) before a defective product, conforming perfectly to the design, is ever created.

‍