Slack vs. Microsoft Teams: Which is Better for Your Business in 2025?

Choosing the right communication platform is a crucial decision for businesses seeking to streamline collaboration, enhance productivity, and foster seamless employee interactions. At Botable.ai, we specialize in AI-powered chatbot solutions that integrate with both Slack and Microsoft Teams, which means we spend a lot of time working with both. To help you make an informed choice, we’ve crafted an in-depth comparison of these two leading platforms, tailored for businesses exploring communication tools. Below, we dive into their features, pricing, integrations, usability, and more, with detailed tables to highlight key differences.

Why Compare Slack vs Microsoft Teams?

Slack and Microsoft Teams dominate the business communication landscape, offering robust tools for messaging, video conferencing, file sharing, and seamless app integrations. Slack is known for its intuitive, channels-based messaging and extensive third-party integrations, while Teams shines with deep Microsoft 365 integration and enterprise-grade features. For growing businesses, selecting the right platform depends on your tech stack, team size, communication style, and budget. Let’s break it down.

Choosing the Right Platform for Your Business

Selecting between Slack vs Microsoft Teams depends on your priorities:

Choose Slack if:

• Your business uses a non-Microsoft tech stack (e.g., Google Workspace, Salesforce).
• You prioritize messaging, external collaboration, and a user-friendly interface.
• You need extensive third-party integrations and quick onboarding.
• Example: A startup with 20 employees using Asana and Zoom would benefit from Slack’s flexibility.

Choose Teams if:

• Your business is invested in Microsoft 365 (Outlook, Word, Excel).
• You rely heavily on video conferencing and real-time document collaboration.
• You need enterprise-grade security and scalability for a large workforce.
• Example: A 500-employee corporation using SharePoint and Power BI would thrive with Teams.

Botable.ai Integration: Regardless of your choice, Botable.ai’s AI chatbots enhance both platforms by automating tasks like onboarding, benefits queries, and IT support. Our bots integrate seamlessly into Slack channels or Teams workspaces, reducing HR workload and boosting employee satisfaction.

Core Features Comparison

Both platforms offer instant messaging, audio calls, video conferencing, file sharing, and app integrations, but their strengths vary. Here’s a side-by-side look at their core features:

Key Takeaway: Slack excels in flexible, messaging-focused communication, with strong external collaboration capabilities. Teams is ideal for video-heavy workflows and businesses embedded in Microsoft’s ecosystem.

Pricing and Plans

Choosing between Microsoft Teams and Slack for business communication involves weighing their costs against your organization’s tech stack and needs. This analysis compares the pricing of Teams and Slack, taking into account scenarios where businesses already use Microsoft 365 or operate outside the Microsoft ecosystem. We include detailed tables and consider hidden costs like onboarding, integrations, and scalability to help you make an informed decision.

Below is a table comparing the annual costs of Slack and Microsoft Teams for businesses with 50, 100, and 200 users, based on the pricing provided for Slack Pro, Teams Essentials, and Teams Business Basic plans.

• Costs are based on annual billing: Slack Pro ($8.75 per user per month), Teams Essentials ($4 per user per month), and Teams Business Basic ($6 per user per month).
• Slack Pro offers unlimited message history and integrations, ideal for non-Microsoft ecosystems.
• Teams Essentials is the most affordable standalone option, but it lacks Microsoft 365 apps and offers limited storage.
• Teams Business Basic includes Microsoft 365 apps and 1TB of storage/user, offering better value for Microsoft-centric businesses.

Pricing Overview

Both platforms offer free plans, but paid tiers unlock advanced features critical for businesses adapting to remote work. Costs vary based on whether you’re embedded in Microsoft 365 or using a non-Microsoft ecosystem. Below is a breakdown of their pricing structures as of 2025.

Note: Pricing reflects annual billing. Slack’s Enterprise Grid requires contacting sales for quotes, which often exceed $20 per user per month for large organizations. Teams’ pricing assumes inclusion in Microsoft 365 subscriptions.

‍

{{cta}}

‍

Scenario 1: Business with Microsoft 365 Subscription

If your business already uses Microsoft 365, Teams is often included, making it a cost-effective choice. For example:

Microsoft 365 Business Basic ($6/user/month): Includes Teams with audio calls, 1TB OneDrive storage, and web versions of Word, Excel, and Outlook. This is cheaper than Slack’s Pro plan ($8.75/user/month), which offers only messaging and integrations without productivity apps.

Microsoft 365 Business Standard ($12.50/user/month): Adds desktop Office apps, webinars, and advanced meeting features, still competitive with Slack’s Business+ plan ($15/user/month).

Cost Savings: Teams leverages existing Microsoft 365 licenses, avoiding additional costs. For a 50-user company, Business Basic saves $1,500/year compared to Slack Pro ($6 vs. $8.75/user/month). For larger teams, savings scale significantly.

Hidden Benefits: Teams’ deep integration with OneDrive, SharePoint, and Outlook enhances remote work efficiency by streamlining workflows (e.g., real-time document collaboration), reducing the need for third-party tools. This can lower software costs compared to Slack, which may require separate subscriptions for file storage or productivity apps.

Drawbacks:

• Limited third-party integrations (700+ vs. Slack’s 2,600+) may require additional tools for non-Microsoft ecosystems, potentially offsetting savings if you rely on apps like Salesforce or Asana.
• Copilot ($30 per user per month) is pricier than Slack AI ($10 per user per month), which adds costs for AI-driven features like meeting summaries.

Scenario 2: Business Outside the Microsoft Ecosystem

For businesses using Google Workspace, Salesforce, or other non-Microsoft tools, Slack often makes more financial sense due to its platform-agnostic integrations and flexibility.

Slack Pro ($8.75 per user per month): Offers unlimited message history and integrations, ideal for diverse tech stacks. No additional Microsoft 365 subscription is needed, unlike Teams, which may require purchasing Microsoft 365 for full functionality.

Teams as Standalone ($4 per user per month): The Teams Essentials plan is cheaper but lacks Office apps and has limited storage (10GB total vs. Slack’s 5GB/user). To match Slack’s features, you’d likely need Business Basic ($6/user/month), reducing the price gap.

Integration Costs: Slack’s 2,600+ integrations (e.g., Google Drive, Zoom, Salesforce) allow seamless connections without additional licenses. Teams’ Microsoft-centric focus may necessitate workarounds or subscriptions for non-Microsoft tools, increasing costs. For example, integrating Salesforce with Teams is less robust than Slack’s native Salesforce app.

Hidden Costs: Slack’s free plan is more restrictive (90-day message history vs. Teams’ unlimited chat), pushing businesses to paid plans sooner. Additionally, Slack’s Enterprise Grid can be costlier than Teams’ Business Premium for large organizations due to custom pricing.

‍

{{cta}}

‍

Hidden Costs and Considerations

Beyond subscription fees, several factors impact the total cost of ownership:

Onboarding: Slack’s user-friendly interface reduces training costs, ideal for startups or small teams. Teams’ complex UI may require more training, especially for non-Microsoft users, potentially costing $500-$2,000 for a 50-user team (assuming $50/hour/employee for training).

Migration: Moving to Teams is smoother for Microsoft 365 users, as data (e.g., OneDrive files) integrates natively. Slack migrations are simpler for diverse tech stacks but may incur costs for third-party app setups ($1,000-$5,000 for complex integrations).

Scalability: Teams scales better for large enterprises (up to 500,000 users on E3 plans), while Slack’s per-user pricing can become expensive for thousands of users. For example, 1,000 users on Slack Business+ ($15/user/month) costs $180,000/year vs. Teams Business Premium ($22/user/month) at $264,000 but includes Microsoft 365 apps.

Add-Ons: Slack may require additional subscriptions (e.g., Google Drive, $6/user/month) for file management, while Teams includes OneDrive/SharePoint.

Cost-Benefit Analysis

Microsoft 365 Users:

• Pros: Teams is often “free” within existing subscriptions, offering significant savings and integrated productivity tools. For a 50-user company on Business Standard, you get Teams, Office apps, and 1TB storage for $7,500/year vs. Slack Pro ($5,250) plus separate productivity apps (e.g., Google Workspace, ~$6,000/year), totaling $11,250/year.
• Cons: Limited third-party integrations may require additional tools, potentially adding $1,000-$5,000/year for licenses or custom development.
• Best for: Enterprises or businesses already using Microsoft 365, prioritizing video conferencing and compliance.

Non-Microsoft Ecosystem:

• Pros: Slack’s flexibility and 2,600+ integrations align with diverse tools, avoiding Microsoft 365 subscription costs. For a 50-user team, Slack Pro ($5,250/year) plus Google Workspace ($6,000/year) is competitive with Teams Business Basic ($3,600) plus third-party app costs.
• Cons: Higher per-user costs for large teams and potential add-on subscriptions (e.g., storage) increase expenses.
• Best for: Startups, SMBs, or teams using Google Workspace, Salesforce, or other non-Microsoft tools.

For a 50-user business, Teams is generally cheaper for Microsoft 365 users, while Slack is more cost-effective for non-Microsoft ecosystems. Evaluate your tech stack, team size, and integration needs to finalize your choice.

‍

{{cta}}

‍

Integrations and Ecosystem

Integrations are crucial for streamlining workflows across different channels. Slack and Teams both support third-party apps, but their ecosystems differ significantly.

Botable.ai Advantage: Our AI chatbots integrate natively with both platforms, enabling HR teams to automate employee queries, onboarding, and ticketing. Whether you choose Slack or Teams, Botable.ai enhances efficiency by delivering instant answers within your preferred workspace.

Key Takeaway: Slack’s vast app directory and platform-agnostic approach suit diverse tech stacks. Teams is unbeatable for Microsoft-centric businesses, with seamless Office 365 integration.

Usability and Onboarding

A user-friendly interface and smooth onboarding are vital for adoption, especially for growing businesses.

Key Takeaway: Slack’s intuitive design and customization make it easier for smaller, agile teams to adopt. Teams’ complex interface suits larger organizations but may require more training.

Security and Compliance

Security is non-negotiable for businesses handling sensitive data. Both platforms prioritize cybersecurity but cater to different compliance needs.

Key Takeaway: Teams edges out for enterprises with complex compliance needs due to Microsoft’s robust security framework. Slack is secure but requires higher tiers for advanced compliance.

Scalability and Target Audience

Your business size and growth trajectory influence platform choice. Here’s how Slack and Teams scale:

Key Takeaway: Slack is ideal for smaller, agile teams or those using a diverse range of tools. Teams scales better for large enterprises, especially those with a Microsoft-centric focus.

Should You Switch Between Slack and Microsoft Teams?

Switching from Slack to Microsoft Teams (or vice versa) is a big decision that depends on your business’s needs, tech stack, and operational goals. Here’s a concise breakdown of why you might—or might not—want to make the switch, tailored for businesses exploring communication platforms.

Reasons to Switch:

From Slack to Teams:

Microsoft 365 Integration: If your business heavily utilizes Microsoft 365 tools (Outlook, OneDrive, Power BI), Teams offers seamless integration, enabling real-time document collaboration and a unified ecosystem, which can potentially reduce app switching.

Cost Efficiency for Enterprises: Teams’ pricing, especially when bundled with Microsoft 365 (e.g., Business Standard at $12.50 per user per month), can be more cost-effective for large organizations compared to Slack’s Business+ ($15 per user per month) or Enterprise Grid.

Advanced Video and Compliance: Teams excels in video conferencing (up to 300 participants, breakout rooms) and audio calls, along with enterprise-grade compliance (HIPAA, FedRAMP), making it ideal for large businesses with complex regulatory needs.

From Teams to Slack:

Third-Party Flexibility: Slack’s 2,600+ app integrations (e.g., Asana, Salesforce) and platform-agnostic approach suit businesses with diverse tech stacks, especially those using Google Workspace or non-Microsoft tools.

Simpler Interface: Slack’s intuitive, customizable design is easier for smaller or tech-savvy teams to adopt, reducing onboarding time and facilitating remote work compared to Teams’ feature-heavy interface.

External Collaboration: Slack’s Shared Channels simplify communication with external partners, making it a better fit for businesses with frequent vendor or client interactions.

Botable.ai Fit: Whether you switch to Slack or Teams, our AI chatbots integrate seamlessly, automating HR tasks like onboarding and FAQs in either platform, ensuring a smooth transition without losing efficiency.

Reasons Not to Switch

Existing Ecosystem Lock-In: If your team is deeply embedded in Microsoft 365, switching to Slack may disrupt workflows due to weaker integration with Office tools. Conversely, moving from Slack to Teams could limit access to Slack’s extensive third-party apps if your business relies on them.

Learning Curve and Costs: Switching requires retraining employees and migrating data, which can be time-consuming and costly. For example, Teams’ complex interface may overwhelm small teams used to Slack’s simplicity, while Slack’s pricing may strain budgets for large enterprises.

Satisfaction with Current Setup: If your current platform meets your needs—especially with Botable.ai’s chatbots enhancing HR and IT support—switching may not justify the effort. Both platforms are robust, and sticking with what works avoids disruption.

Key Considerations When Switching

Before switching, assess your team size, tech stack, and communication priorities. Conduct a cost-benefit analysis, including training and migration expenses. Pilot the new platform with a small group to test compatibility.

Switch if the new platform aligns better with your ecosystem and long-term goals. If your current tool is effective, staying put might be the smarter move.

Slack and Microsoft Teams are both powerful communication platforms, but their strengths cater to different needs. Slack’s intuitive, customizable interface and vast integrations make it a favorite for startups and SMBs. Teams’ deep Microsoft 365 integration, robust video features, and scalability suit larger enterprises. By evaluating your tech stack, team size, and communication style, you can choose the platform that aligns with your business goals.

‍

{{cta}}